Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect
Date
Msg-id 489605.1741216241@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add contrib/pg_logicalsnapinspect
List pgsql-hackers
Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> writes:
> yeah makes sense. Done in the attached, and bonus point I realized that the
> test could be simplified (so, removing useless steps in passing).

Just a side note: tayra showed two instances of this failure today
[1][2].  That's not using valgrind.  I wonder if we changed something
else recently that would make this more probable?

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tayra&dt=2025-03-05%2021%3A36%3A40
[2] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=tayra&dt=2025-03-05%2013%3A42%3A17



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: explain plans for foreign servers