Re: variadic function support - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Florian G. Pflug
Subject Re: variadic function support
Date
Msg-id 487B54D8.9020407@phlo.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: variadic function support  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: variadic function support
List pgsql-patches
Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> One issue that just occurred to me: what if a variadic function
>> wants to turn around and call another variadic function, passing
>> the same array argument on to the second one?  This is closely akin
>>  to the problem faced by C "..." functions, and the solutions are
>> pretty ugly (sprintf vs vsprintf for instance).  Can we do any
>> better?  At least in the polymorphic case, I'm not sure we can :-(.
>>  maybe with some flag like PARAMS?
>
> SELECT least(PARAMS ARRAY[1,2,3,4,5,6])

Just FYI, this is more or less how ruby handles variadic functions - a
"*" before the last argument in the function's *definition* causes all
additional arguments to be stored in an array, while a "*" before the
last argument in a function *call* expands an array into single arguments.

So, you could e.g do
def variadic1(a, b, *c)
   # c is in array containing all parameters after second one.
end

def variadic_wrapper(a, *b)
   variadic1("foobar", a, *b)
end

So there is precedent for the "flag idea" too. Plus, I kind of like the
idea of using the same syntax for both wrapping and unwrapping of
variadic arguments.

regards, Florian Pflug


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: variadic function support
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: variadic function support