Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com> writes:
> ... It sounds like it'd be a pain at best.
Also, that would directly violate the SQL spec's model of dependencies,
with possibly unpleasant consequences. The current implementation does
exactly what SQL says to do. I cite from SQL99 11.99 DROP CONSTRAINT:
3) If TC is a unique constraint and RC is a referential constraint whose referenced table is T and
whosereferenced columns are the unique columns of TC, then RC is said to be dependent on TC.
...
6) If RESTRICT is specified, then:
a) No table constraint shall be dependent on TC.
NOTE 195 - If CASCADE is specified, then any such dependent object will be dropped by the
effectiveexecution of the <alter table statement> specified in the General Rules of this
Subclause.
regards, tom lane