Re: generic pseudotype IO functions? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?
Date
Msg-id 4861.1389025709@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 1/6/14, 10:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This will break some of the function sanity checks in opr_sanity,

> Then the tests can be changed.

That will weaken their ability to detect actual mistakes, no?

If there were a large benefit to merging the pseudotype I/O functions,
I'd think this would be acceptable; but merging them seems of mighty
marginal value.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: dynamic shared memory and locks
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Convert Datum* to char*