Re: Deadlock with pg_dump? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Deadlock with pg_dump?
Date
Msg-id 4826.1172517083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Deadlock with pg_dump?  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Deadlock with pg_dump?  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Yeh, LOG would be most appropriate, but thats not possible.

You have not given any good reason for that.

> log_min_messages allows only DEBUG5, DEBUG4, DEBUG3, DEBUG2, DEBUG1,
> INFO, NOTICE and WARNING for non-error states.

I don't think you understand quite how the log message priority works...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Deadlock with pg_dump?
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Deadlock with pg_dump?