Re: Map forks (WIP) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Map forks (WIP)
Date
Msg-id 48215614.4080307@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Map forks (WIP)  ("Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Map forks (WIP)
List pgsql-patches
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I'm not completely satisfied with the way this looks, so I'll try a
> slightly different approach next: Instead of having one SMgrRelation per
> fork, add an extra ForkNumber argument to all the smgr functions.

Here's an updated patch using the above approach. Looks much better now,
IMO. The FSM implementation is still an incomplete mess, so don't bother
looking into freespace.c or indexfsm.c, but I'm quite happy with the
forks stuff now.

I shall work on the FSM internals next...

--
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Alex Hunsaker"
Date:
Subject: Re: [badalex@gmail.com: Re: [BUGS] Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited]
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql CASE statement - last version