Tom Lane napsal(a):
> I wrote:
>> Another possible answer is to change the minimum to be just 64K always.
>> I'm not certain that it's really sensible to tie the minimum work_mem to
>> BLCKSZ --- I don't think we do anything where work_mem is controlling a
>> pool of page buffers, do we?
>
> I've committed this change in HEAD. There's no desire to back-patch it
> is there?
Back patch is not necessary. It is important for head, because
--with-blocksize=BLOCKSIZE allows to run buildfarm with different blocksize and
I think users will start to play more with this option.
Zdenek
