Craig Ringer wrote:
> firerox@centrum.cz wrote:
>> It takes more then 0.05s :(
>>
>> Only this function reduce server speed max to 20request per second.
>>
> If you need that sort of frequent database access, you might want to
> look into:
>
> - Doing more work in each connection and reducing the number of
> connections required;
> - Using multiple connections in parallel;
> - Pooling connections so you don't need to create a new one for every
> job;
> - Using a more efficient database connector and/or language;
> - Dispatching requests to a persistent database access provider that's
> always connected
>
Oh, I missed:
Use a UNIX domain socket rather than a TCP/IP local socket. Database
interfaces that support UNIX sockets (like psycopg) will normally do
this if you omit the host argument entirely.
--
Craig Ringer
