Re: pgbench not setting scale size correctly? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Justin
Subject Re: pgbench not setting scale size correctly?
Date
Msg-id 47DAB17D.1080308@emproshunts.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgbench not setting scale size correctly?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pgbench not setting scale size correctly?
Re: pgbench not setting scale size correctly?
List pgsql-general


Tom Lane wrote:
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes: 
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:   
Yeah, -s is only meaningful when given with -i.  Maybe someday we ought
to fix pgbench to complain if you try to set it at other times.     
 
You have to pass -s in to the actual run if you're specifying your own 
custom script(s) using -f and you want the :scale variable to be defined.    
Right, I knew that at one time ;-)
 
The way the option parsing code is done would make complaining in the case 
where your parameter is ignored a bit of a contortion.  The part that 
detects based on the database is after all the other parsing because the 
connection has to be brought up first.   
Yeah.  But couldn't we have that part issue a warning if -s had been set
on the command line?
		regards, tom lane
 
I was wondering why the -s would  not rescale the data? 

IMHO a warning would be fine

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: postgre vs MySQL
Next
From: Thomas Harold
Date:
Subject: Re: postgre vs MySQL