Re: pgbench not setting scale size correctly? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgbench not setting scale size correctly?
Date
Msg-id 18343.1205509788@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgbench not setting scale size correctly?  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Responses Re: pgbench not setting scale size correctly?  (Justin <justin@emproshunts.com>)
List pgsql-general
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, -s is only meaningful when given with -i.  Maybe someday we ought
>> to fix pgbench to complain if you try to set it at other times.

> You have to pass -s in to the actual run if you're specifying your own
> custom script(s) using -f and you want the :scale variable to be defined.

Right, I knew that at one time ;-)

> The way the option parsing code is done would make complaining in the case
> where your parameter is ignored a bit of a contortion.  The part that
> detects based on the database is after all the other parsing because the
> connection has to be brought up first.

Yeah.  But couldn't we have that part issue a warning if -s had been set
on the command line?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: Re: postgre vs MySQL
Next
From: Erik Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: Trigger to run @ connection time?