Tom Lane napsal(a):
> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes:
>> Tom Lane napsal(a):
>>> These examples suggest that maybe what we want is not so much a "no
>>> segments ever" mode as a segment size larger than 1GB.
>
>> PS: ZFS is happy with 2^64bit size and UFS has 1TB file size limit
>> (depends on solaris version)
>
> So even on Solaris, "no segments ever" is actually a pretty awful idea.
> As it stands, the code would fail on tables > 1TB.
>
> I'm thinking we need to reconsider this patch. Rather than disabling
> segmentation altogether, we should see it as allowing use of segments
> larger than 1GB. I suggest that we ought to just flat rip out the "non
> segmenting" code paths in md.c, and instead look into what segment sizes
> are appropriate on different platforms.
Yes, agree. It seems only ZFS is OK at this moment and if somebody sets
32TB he gets nonsegment mode anyway. I looked into posix standard and
there is useful function which can be used. See
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/pathconf.html
Maybe we can put additional test into configure and collect appropriate
data from buildfarm.
I think current patch could stay in CVS and I will rip out non segment
code path in a new patch.
Zdenek
