Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Another question that occurred to me - did you try using strpbrk() to >> look for the next interesting character rather than your homegrown >> searcher gadget? If so, how did that perform? > > It looks like strpbrk() performs poorly: Yes, not surprising. I just looked at the implementation in glibc, which I assume you are using, and it seemed rather basic. The one in NetBSD's libc looks much more efficient. See http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/libc/string/strpbrk.c?rev=1.1.2.1&content-type=text/plain&cvsroot=glibc and http://cvsweb.de.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/string/strpbrk.c?rev=1.16;content-type=text%2Fx-cvsweb-markup Not that what you've done isn't good, if a little obscure (as is the NetBSD implementation) cheers andrew
pgsql-patches by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных