Florian G. Pflug wrote:
>
>> Would it be possible to determine when the copy is starting that this
>> case holds, and not use the parallel parsing idea in those cases?
>
> In theory, yes. In pratice, I don't want to be the one who has to
> answer to an angry user who just suffered a major drop in COPY
> performance after adding an ENUM column to his table.
>
>
I am yet to be convinced that this is even theoretically a good path to
follow. Any sufficiently large table could probably be partitioned and
then we could use the parallelism that is being discussed for pg_restore
without any modification to the backend at all. Similar tricks could be
played by an external bulk loader for third party data sources.
cheers
andrew
