Tom Lane wrote:
> The concern I've got about this is basically that it would encourage
> plastering the same label on subtly different counts, leading to
> confusion and perhaps mistaken conclusions. I would prefer to see any
> common probes be reverse-engineered *after the fact*, ie, after you've
> already instrumented several DB's you're in a better position to figure
> out what's common and what's not. I distrust preconceived notions about
> that.
>
>
Your point is well taken, and we can revisit this later!
Regards,
-Robert
