> On 30 Nov 2021, at 20:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Vincas Dargis <vindrg@gmail.com> writes:
>> checking which random number source to use... /dev/urandom
>> checking for /dev/urandom...
>> configure: error: cannot check for file existence when cross compiling
>
> Hmm ... this evidently stems from 16f96c74d.
>
> AFAICS this is the only test in our configure script that is a hard
> fail when cross-compiling, and I don't see a reason for it to be that.
> We could just assume that /dev/urandom will be available --- that's no
> worse than a lot of the other optimistic assumptions that configure
> makes in that mode.
Agreed, I don't see a problem with that. I'm not terribly familiar with
supporting cross compilation in autoconf, would a reasonable approach be to
just remove the check altogether like the below sketch?
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index a5c10b8d56..80fe0de38d 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -2289,13 +2289,6 @@ elif test x"$PORTNAME" = x"win32" ; then
AC_MSG_RESULT([Windows native])
else
AC_MSG_RESULT([/dev/urandom])
- AC_CHECK_FILE([/dev/urandom], [], [])
-
- if test x"$ac_cv_file__dev_urandom" = x"no" ; then
- AC_MSG_ERROR([
-no source of strong random numbers was found
-PostgreSQL can use OpenSSL, native Windows API or /dev/urandom as a source of random numbers.])
- fi
fi
--
Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
