Re: Proposed archival read only trigger on rows - prevent history modification - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bryce Nesbitt
Subject Re: Proposed archival read only trigger on rows - prevent history modification
Date
Msg-id 47B1580A.7050703@obviously.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed archival read only trigger on rows - prevent history modification  (chester c young <chestercyoung@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Proposed archival read only trigger on rows - prevent history modification
Re: Proposed archival read only trigger on rows - prevent history modification
List pgsql-sql
Yes, the view approach has some advantages.  But it still leaves the
underlying tables naked to modification.
And since the most likely error is... well... me (or another admin) at
the SQL prompt, we want underlying tables protected also.

chester c young wrote:
> instead of triggers I use update-able views and permissions.
>
> 1. all dml goes through the view
> 2. use rules on the view to do dml to the table
> 3. in rules prevent updating all/any columns when whatever
> 4. grant dml to view to your pgconnect user
> 5. revoke dml from table to your pgconnect user
>
> imho another instance where rules rule.  for example, you can easily
> fit logging into the same view.
>   

-- 
----
Visit http://www.obviously.com/



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Bryce Nesbitt
Date:
Subject: Backward compatibility psql 8.1 to 8.2
Next
From: Bryce Nesbitt
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed archival read only trigger on rows - prevent history modification