Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Russell Smith
Subject Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Date
Msg-id 479D9966.6000108@pws.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Guillaume Smet wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Jan 28, 2008 7:27 AM, Russell Smith <mr-russ@pws.com.au> wrote:
>
>> Can somebody explain why it's important to load with
>> synchronized_scanning off?
>>
>> do_sql_command(g_conn, "SET synchronized_scanning TO off");
>>
>
> It's the start point of this patch. See this thread [
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00987.php ]
> for more information
Sorry, total brain fade in interpreting the patch.

g_conn is our connection to the database, not the command we are dumping.

Sorry

Russell

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Guillaume Smet"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Auto-explain patch