On 2018/10/09 0:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Keeping that comparison in mind, I'm inclined to think that 0001
>> is the best thing to do for now. The incremental win from 0002
>> is not big enough to justify the API break it creates, while your
>> 0005 is not really attacking the problem the right way.
>
> I've pushed 0001 now. I believe that closes out all the patches
> discussed in this thread, so I've marked the CF entry committed.
> Thanks for all the hard work!
Thanks a lot for reviewing and committing.
Regards,
Amit
