Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>> Bad choice of words. But if your patch is applied, I can't see a diff
>>>> of your changes. And it's still logged as one ad and one remove. so I
>>>> can't easily diff between tomorrows version and one two steps back.
>>>> And since there really is no gain, imnsho, I see no reason to take
>>>> away that ability.
>>> O.k. I just checked and if I use svn mv instead of svn rm and svn add,
>>> then the changelog will follow. That should remove your concern yes?
>> Magnus' concern is svn diff, which does not really work. (I've been
>> annoyed by this).
>
> correct. And I repeat that I see no actual gain countering this annoyance... If there was enough on the plus side,
I'dbe happy to live with it...
Consistency is more important than general annoyance but I am trying to
find a happy medium here. What if I leave the old file in place but
empty with a comment of why? Thus the svn diff etc... stays intact.
Considering we are now talking about contributors not developer bios
that should be sufficient.
I will admit that I didn't change the underlying tables. I wanted to but
didn't because I am unaware of what else may call to them.
Joshua D. Drake
