Re: 8.3beta3: Compile Warnings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zdenek Kotala
Subject Re: 8.3beta3: Compile Warnings
Date
Msg-id 4746C5CC.7090200@sun.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to 8.3beta3: Compile Warnings  (Thomas Güttler <hv@tbz-pariv.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tt seems that GCC makes decision do not inline this function and then it 
will keep as a standard function. It is not problem and this warning is 
generated by -Winline. I don't have this problem with GCC 3.4.3
Zdenek


Thomas Güttler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I get the following compile warnings:
> 
> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing
-I../../../../src/include-D_GNU_SOURCE   -c -o like.o like.c
 
> like.c: In function `texticnlike':
> like.c:137: warning: inlining failed in call to `Generic_Text_IC_like'
> like.c:356: warning: called from here
> like.c: In function `texticlike':
> like.c:137: warning: inlining failed in call to `Generic_Text_IC_like'
> like.c:344: warning: called from here
> like.c: In function `nameicnlike':
> like.c:137: warning: inlining failed in call to `Generic_Text_IC_like'
> like.c:332: warning: called from here
> like.c: In function `nameiclike':
> like.c:137: warning: inlining failed in call to `Generic_Text_IC_like'
> like.c:317: warning: called from here
> 
> gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -Wno-error
-I../include-I../../../../src/interfaces/ecpg/include -I. -DMAJOR_VERSION=4 -DMINOR_VERSION=4 -D
 
> PATCHLEVEL=0 -I../../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE   -c -o preproc.o preproc.c
> pgc.c:3864: warning: `yy_flex_realloc' defined but not used
> 
> 
> Versions: 
>  postgresql-8.3beta3
>  gcc (GCC) 3.3.4 (pre 3.3.5 20040809)
>  Linux fooserver 2.6.8-24.25-smp #1 SMP Thu Aug 24 09:57:32 UTC 2006 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>  SuSE Linux 9.2 (x86-64)
> 
> Should this reported to the bug tracker?
> 
>  Thomas Güttler
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dragan Zubac
Date:
Subject: Transaction question
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Ordered Append Node