I was playing with a Nevada server and noticed a rush on the FPU
(the Nevada has a single shared FPU for its 32 threads).
Looking at the spinlock code, I found :
cur_delay += (int) (cur_delay * ((double) random() / (double) MAX_RANDOM_VALUE) + 0.5);
I understand the reasoning for the backoff (as of the discussion on
2003-08-05), but is there any particular reason for using floating
point operations here ? Maybe a modulo would be just as good (or
better since it doesn't involve the FPU) ?
Something like: cur_delay += random() % (cur_delay + 1) ;
--Magne
