Re: Training events policy ... first test case

From: Magnus Hagander
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case
Date: ,
Msg-id: 471F8F3F.8040908@hagander.net
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake")
Responses: Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake")
List: pgsql-www

Tree view

Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Robert Treat, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Robert Treat, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Magnus Hagander", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Simon Riggs, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Peter Eisentraut, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Magnus Hagander, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
    Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kevin Hunter, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Tom Lane, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
           Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
        Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
           Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
            Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Marc G. Fournier", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
              Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
            Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
             Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
              Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
               Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
                Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
                 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
         Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
          Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Bruce Momjian, )
          Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
           Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
            Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
             Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
             Re: [SPAM] Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (, )
     Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
      Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Dave Page, )
       Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Josh Berkus, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kris Jurka, )
 Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Dave Page", )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Kris Jurka, )
  Re: Training events policy ... first test case  ("Joshua D. Drake", )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )
   Re: Training events policy ... first test case  (Chander Ganesan, )

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:51:28 -0700
> Josh Berkus <> wrote:
> Hmm I like that. I guess it depends on how much room we have on the
> page for such a thing. One thought would be to swap LATEST NEWS for
> UPCOMING TRAINING. 
> 
> That would give more room to what is likely our most sought after
> information on the front page.

I don't like that part :-)


>> I *don't* buy the argument that "we can trust EDB so they're exempt
>> from the restrictions we level on other providers," since we don't
>> seem to have cut OTG any slack whatsoever despite their contributions.
> 
> I believe that we should not trust *any* company that is submitting
> their news through a PR firm. PR firms, lie, on purpose, for profit.
> They make money on manipulation, not truth or substance.

Why does it matter how they're submitting it? Plus, we're talking
events, not news here.

But if we have a policy, *everybody* should be treated the same way
against it. Including edb, and including cmd if that would become an
issue. The only exception that would be reasonable is if there was a
completely community-driven not-for-profit training event, IMHO.

//Magnus



pgsql-www by date:

From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Training events policy ... first test case