Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Date
Msg-id 471EA10C.9080101@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Now to the extent that regular commit-fests keep patch development
> more closely aligned with the mainline CVS, the fest proposal might
> indirectly alleviate your pain.  But I'd think that snaps taken
> *after* the fests would be the best for that, as they'd be closer
> to what any subsequent development would be based on.  The stability
> argument I made doesn't seem like a problem for testing purposes,
> only if someone were to try to use such a snap for production purposes
> (which putting them up for archiving might encourage).
>
>             
>   

It might be worth applying a simple tag (but not a branch) at the end 
(and maybe also at the start) of each checkpoint/fest/whatever

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4