Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>> I'm fairly resistant to putting less-than-ready code in the tree, I must
>> say.
>>
>
> Me too, at least if "less than ready" means "unstable". The committed
> code has to always be solid enough to let everybody continue working on
> their own bits. However, in the past we've tended to refuse stuff if
> it "didn't do anything interesting", and I think that attitude will need
> adjustment. We'll have to be prepared to accept patches that are only
> interesting as waystations to some long-term goal.
>
>
>
Yes, this is a sensible adjustment, even across releases, IMNSHO.
cheers
andrew
