Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>
>> Anyway, is there anyone who thinks the "cycle the queue every 6 weeks or 2
>> months or suitable short period" is a *bad* idea? It might be hard to pull
>> off, but we won't know until we try.
>>
>
> It seems worth a try --- we can certainly abandon it easily if it
> doesn't work.
>
> Personally I feel every six weeks would be too short: we'd be talking
> only a month of work between commit-fests. I like a two-month cycle
> partly because it wouldn't rotate relative to the calendar: we'd always
> know that the first half of every odd-numbered month, or something like
> that, is commit-fest time.
>
>
>
+1 on both counts.
cheers
andrew
