Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
Date
Msg-id 471CF1C2.5080405@hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:27:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> There's legitimate use for creating a role with NOLOGIN and a password.
>> If we think that, then we shouldn't have a message at all.
> 
> At least if we think it's more than a very narrow legitimate use, compared
> to the number of ppl making the mistake.
> 
> I agree with making it a NOTICE instead of WARNING though.

Did we ever come to a conclusion on this or not? I've changed my patch
per the suggestions in the thread, but I've held back on committing it
to hear arguments... Go or no-go?

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Next
From: Florian Weimer
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit