Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
Date
Msg-id 20071017164100.GF6268@svr2.hagander.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:27:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > There's legitimate use for creating a role with NOLOGIN and a password.
> 
> If we think that, then we shouldn't have a message at all.

At least if we think it's more than a very narrow legitimate use, compared
to the number of ppl making the mistake.

I agree with making it a NOTICE instead of WARNING though.

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file