Mohamed Wael Khobalatte <mkhobalatte@grubhub.com> writes:
> When doing a parallel pg_restore (v12) against a dump created through a
> pipe using an earlier version (11 all the way to 9.6), it fails with the
> known error of not finding data offsets. I understand the reasons for it
> (potential inability to seek), which is documented in pg_restore.
> What I don't understand is why the same `pg_restore -j` worked in earlier
> versions (say running pg_restore_v11 against the same dumps). Has anything
> changed in terms of ordering? I am actually quite curious what led to this
> finally breaking consistently.
Without a concrete example it's hard to say, but maybe the issue is that
v12 is more aggressive about parallelizing restores --- see 548e50976.
regards, tom lane
