Re: Upgrade time, dump+restore trouble. - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Jesper Krogh
Subject Re: Upgrade time, dump+restore trouble.
Date
Msg-id 47165E55.4020807@krogh.cc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Upgrade time, dump+restore trouble.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Upgrade time, dump+restore trouble.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc> writes:
>> The tables are running a "home-made" timetravelling feature where a
>> contraint on the table implements the foreing keys on the table.
>
> You mean you have check constraints that do selects on other tables?

Yes. We do.. we have to .. in order to perserve the foreing-keys.
What we have in short is:
Added two timestamps on each columns, starttime,endtime. When endtime is
"null" the record is "current" and a view exposes this from the table.
The foreing keys are then implemented using contraints that look up the
id in the foreing table and ensures that there is a record where the
endtime is null present

> You have just found out (one reason) why that's a bad idea.

Do you have any other reasons?

>> How can I instruct pg_dumpall to turn off these constriants during
>> dump/restore?
>
> Drop the constraints in the source database.

That would be my workaround for the problem. But isn't it somehow
desirable that pg_dumpall | psql "allways" would work?

Jesper
--
Jesper Krogh, jesper@krogh.cc


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Upgrade time, dump+restore trouble.
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql para windows para 64 bits