-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 12:06 -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
>> It has tended to turn into recommendations to "write a function"
>> because the desired functionality is almost never a constant. People
>> *claim* that they want to grant access to everything, but there are
>> commonly exceptions.
> A reasonable use case for this feature would be adding a read-only
> reporting role that needs access to a group of tables that all happen to
> be within a schema.
>
> This isn't critical, but for people who use an ORM that don't want to
> think about the database, it's handy.
I could easily argue that this is more a problem than a solution. Don't
get me wrong, I understand your point but frankly, if one is willing to
take such a lax approach to your data security... they should just run
flat files with RAID 0 ;)
Joshua D. Drake
>
> That being said, I'm not volunteering to write it, especially not in
> response to a rude request.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHAqJ6ATb/zqfZUUQRAv8rAJ9Q+36xiJEDSSymkueS/HmJJOlVNwCbBKHY
NxC9TbGJLy6qpzYxBwI6vdM=
=L5pF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
