Paul Lindner wrote:
> For the record:
>
> Please please please note that I'm only trying to solve a particular
> problem here. I know what I want to do is messy, ugly and a little
> impure and flies in the face of elegant design.
>
> If it helps think of what I'm proposing as akin to denormalization
> of a beautiful schema to achieve specific goals.
I am going to suggest what I suggested early on in this thread again:
(1) Modify your copy of the JDBC driver so that the v3 protocol path
does not use named statements or portals
(2) Deploy your modified driver into your specific environment
I don't think anything short of the "right" solution is going to be
suitable for general purpose use.
-O
