-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>> I have not seen a single argument against the above and it has been
>> mentioned by other people (although the wording my be slightly
>> different).
>
> It seems like a good FAQ addition. The only downside I can see
> to adopting the two names as equally valid ways to describe PG is:
>
> Q. So... what is "QL" then?
> A. Aaaarrrrgggghhhh!
I humbly submit that those who would actually ask that, just be kindly
asked to move on to MySQL and leave us alone.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG6tTiATb/zqfZUUQRAsd+AKCAt3Rfqj40JXWCQGoFqs2rzkSg8gCgqeKW
wklfphJmutcfwOTKKJ3JDbc=
=SwLj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
