-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, September 14, 2007 11:37:22 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>>> I have not seen a single argument against the above and it has been
>>> mentioned by other people (although the wording my be slightly
>>> different).
>>
>> It seems like a good FAQ addition. The only downside I can see
>> to adopting the two names as equally valid ways to describe PG is:
>>
>> Q. So... what is "QL" then?
>> A. Aaaarrrrgggghhhh!
>
> I humbly submit that those who would actually ask that, just be kindly
> asked to move on to MySQL and leave us alone.
+1
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFG6zRi4QvfyHIvDvMRAhbLAJ0VRyXj6v1PQf3NxIOoDdUTcfdFLACeOCJO
adfEY8wDofy6Gr5uItqmOY4=
=hnWv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
