On Feb 19, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Kris Jurka wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, peter royal wrote:
>
>> i'm mainly concerned about single-column functional indexes right now.
>> being able to get upper(a) as the column name would be enough now. but
>> tom's method for working with multi-column functional indices would be
>> a bonus too.
>>
>> would a patch to have DMD.getIndexInfo() return this information be
>> accepted into the tree? if so, i'll work one up.
>
>
> Yes, a column name of "pg_expression_N" is rather useless. upper(a)
> may
> not be a column name, but it is more accurate and informative.
Patch + test cases attached.
-pete
