Re: invalidly encoded strings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: invalidly encoded strings
Date
Msg-id 46E4BB00.6020304@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: invalidly encoded strings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: invalidly encoded strings
Re: invalidly encoded strings
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> In the short run it might be best to do it in scan.l after all.  
>   

I have not come up with a way of doing that and handling the bytea case. 
If you have I'm all ears. And then I am still worried about COPY.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: invalidly encoded strings
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: invalidly encoded strings