-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/17/07 21:45, Steve Manes wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Moving all the application-bound inserts into stored procedures didn't
>>> achieve nearly the performance enhancement I'd assumed I'd get, which I
>>> figured was due to the overhead of the procs themselves.
>>
>> Would that be because the original app was written in a compiled
>> language, but the SPs in an interpreted language?
>
> No, because the application language was Perl5 for both. I think it was
> just the overhead of 2 million inserts via procs versus 2 million inline
> inserts (without the proc overhead).
Interesting. Does PG have to initiate the Perl interpreter every
time you call a Perl-written SP?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGxwiAS9HxQb37XmcRAgi2AJ9Yq2drImecZVTbZR0Wo4VKlpaiXwCgpjHo
8KcDWqDpW6BWNWCj+ZUQFU4=
=Qlpg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
