Re: point in time recovery and moving datafiles online - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
Subject Re: point in time recovery and moving datafiles online
Date
Msg-id 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB51D@m0114.s-mxs.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to point in time recovery and moving datafiles online  (Marc Munro <marc@bloodnok.com>)
Responses Re: point in time recovery and moving datafiles online  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Yes. But I think you might have to avoid "vacuum full" during data file backup.
>
> Why?  If vacuum is unsafe in this scenario, wouldn't it also be unsafe
> in event of a system crash?

I was not sure we are 100% crash safe during "vacuum full".
But yes, now recalling your last remark on a crash during vacuum full
I guess we should be.

> I do believe that vacuum should (but presently does not) emit a WAL
> record showing its truncation of the file, so that the equivalent
> truncation can be repeated during replay.

> However, this is needed in any case.

I see, but it has only the effect of not freeing the space to the OS,
so it is not really a bug ? Next vacuum will do it anyway.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Automatic transactions in psql
Next
From: bpalmer
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication direction