Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
Subject Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Date
Msg-id 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA40184D140@m0114.s-mxs.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Nested Transactions, Abort All  (Thomas Swan <tswan@idigx.com>)
Responses Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I'd opt for BEGIN as a start of a subtransaction (no need for special
> semantics in plpgsql), the corresponding END simply changes the
> transaction context to the parent level.

But 'BEGIN' in plpgsql does not start a [sub]transaction, it starts a
statement block. Are we intending to change that ? I think not.

Andreas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All