Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy
From | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
Date | |
Msg-id | 46B9F42A.3020101@commandprompt.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres ("Derek Rodner" <derek.rodner@enterprisedb.com>) |
List | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Derek Rodner wrote: > Josh, > > We are trying to make it easy for the newbies and that is what this new > distribution and site are designed for!!!!! > > As for the comment about the Fortune 1000? They ALL RUN MySQL > somewhere. We know. We have talked to them. They actually recognize > that it is not enterprise-class, etc. but, it was free and easy to use. They don't run it where they would be running Oracle. They do run PostgreSQL in those spots. Oh and as a sticking point, I said Fortune 5000 ;) Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > > > Derek M. Rodner > Director, Product Strategy > EnterpriseDB Corporation > 732.331.1333 office > 484.252.1943 cell > www.enterprisedb.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua D. Drake [mailto:jd@commandprompt.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 9:37 AM > To: Derek Rodner > Cc: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] EnterpriseDB Postgres > >> thrive on that. My college basketball team is always the underdog. >> EnterpriseDB is the underdog to Oracle. Postgres is the underdog to >> MySQL. I am starting to get sick of that and want Postgres to stop >> being the underdog. We know we are better than MySQL. Most of the > > I was with you, until right here. I think you have vastly misestimated > the market. I will concur that PostgreSQL is the underdog to MySQL in > one very specific sense: > > The ignorant and the code monkey. > > The knowledgable (including many of the fortune 5000) won't touch MySQL > because it is broke, where PostgreSQL isn't. > > Now all that being said, there is zero argument that if you can get all > the people running Ubuntu, wanting to run PostgreSQL that our community > will grow. However I wonder, seriously how much of our community would > be willing to deal with that level of newness. > > A good portion of our community are DBMS snobs. They have no basis in > reality and are more interested in what is "right" versus what actually > "works". > > Is that bad? I don't know, sometimes, sometimes not. > > Sincerely, > > Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGufQqATb/zqfZUUQRAjL3AJ9/VpXnoUXEcyaBMV5oSpdvtPXaXACfeQsl 5aSyVT6h270jXWzGCS5qgJE= =cCjl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
pgsql-advocacy by date: