Vacuum full considered useful ;) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Patric de Waha
Subject Vacuum full considered useful ;)
Date
Msg-id 4698F0CF.7000602@p-dw.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)  (Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>)
List pgsql-performance
Hi,
    Something I'd like to share.

    I switched to postgres about 4 months ago.
   The perfomance after a while got worse.
    I posted a message here, where the result was that my IO was the
problem.

    I run vacuum every night. I never used vacuum full because it is not
    explicitly recommended and I read somewhere in the archives a mail that
    the consistency of the db suffered after a vacuum full run.

    Yesterday I switched from 8.1 to 8.2. So I needed to dump the dbase
    and reimport it. The dbase after 4 months of running without "vacuum
full"
    reached 60 gigabyte of diskspace. Now after a fresh import it only
has 5 gigabyte!

    No wonder, I got IO problems with such a fragmentation.

    For people not very familiar with postgres especially those coming
from mysql,
    i'd recommend paying attention to this.

regards,
    patric de waha


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Hannes Dorbath
Date:
Subject: Re: FORGOT TO CONFIGURE RAID! DELL POWEREDGE 2950
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)