Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)
Date
Msg-id 4698F8EE.8090603@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Vacuum full considered useful ;)  (Patric de Waha <lists@p-dw.com>)
Responses Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)  (Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>)
List pgsql-performance
>    No wonder, I got IO problems with such a fragmentation.
>
>    For people not very familiar with postgres especially those coming
> from mysql,
>    i'd recommend paying attention to this.

Definitely. The problem here is that you just aren't vacuuming enough,
not that you didn't vacuum full. I would suggest reviewing autovacuum
and seeing if that will help you.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards,
>    patric de waha
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>


--

       === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Patric de Waha
Date:
Subject: Vacuum full considered useful ;)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)