Re: GSSAPI on Solaris - psql segfault - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Subject Re: GSSAPI on Solaris - psql segfault
Date
Msg-id 46987A82.4010208@kaltenbrunner.cc
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GSSAPI on Solaris - psql segfault  (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>)
List pgsql-hackers
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> I just took a look at adding gssapi build support on solaris (solaris
>> 10/x86_64, sun studio 10, 64bit build) which seemed easy enough by
>> educating configure to look for -lgss but while it compiles just fine
>> the resulting tree will not be able to complete a make check due to
>> psql(!) segfaulting as soon as it tries to connect to the backend.
>> the backtrace looks similiar to:
>>
>>
>> program terminated by signal SEGV (no mapping at the fault address)
>> 0x00007fffffd3d401: _memcpy+0x00e1:     movq     %rax,(%rdi)
>> Current function is pqPutMsgBytes
>>   475           memcpy(conn->outBuffer + conn->outMsgEnd, buf, len);
>> (dbx) where
>>   [1] _memcpy(0x4, 0x4709a0, 0x67, 0x2, 0x646c697562677000,
>> 0x7361626174616400), at 0x7fffffd3d401
>> =>[2] pqPutMsgBytes(buf = 0x4709a0, len = 103U, conn = 0x4682f0), line
>> 475 in "fe-misc.c"
>>   [3] pqPutnchar(s = 0x4709a0 "", len = 103U, conn = 0x4682f0), line 189
>> in "fe-misc.c"
>>   [4] pqPacketSend(conn = 0x4682f0, pack_type = '\0', buf = 0x4709a0,
>> buf_len = 103U), line 2439 in "fe-connect.c"
>>   [5] PQconnectPoll(conn = 0x4682f0), line 1299 in "fe-connect.c"
>>   [6] connectDBComplete(conn = 0x4682f0), line 936 in "fe-connect.c"
>>   [7] PQsetdbLogin(pghost = (nil), pgport = (nil), pgoptions = (nil),
>> pgtty = (nil), dbName = 0xfffffd7fffdffbeb "postgres", login = (nil),
>> pwd = (nil)), line 660 in "fe-connect.c"
>>   [8] main(argc = 3, argv = 0xfffffd7fffdff9b8), line 211 in "startup.c"
>>
>>
>> ideas ?
> 
> Do you use also 64bit psql? Can you send me your ./configure setup?
> However, I see there potential integer overflow, because len is size_t
> and  conn->outMsgEnd is defined as int.

yeah this is a full 64bit build - but I just did several fresh buildfarm
cycles and I'm unable to reproduce the issue again ...


Stefan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Affan Salman"
Date:
Subject: Re: FK Deferred RI Triggers & SAVEPOINTs --- A"C"ID violation
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: non-blocking CREATE INDEX in 8.2??