Hi Horiguchi-san,
> (Why me?)
Because the story was also related to PG-REX, which you are
also involved in developing. Perhaps off-list instead of
-hackers would have been better, but I emailed -hackers because
the same problem could be encountered by PostgreSQL users who
do not use PG-REX.
>> In a project I helped with, I encountered an issue where
>> the archive command kept failing. I thought this issue was
>> related to the problem in this thread, so I'm sharing it here.
>> If I should create a new thread, please let me know.
>>
>> * Problem
>> - The archive_command is failed always.
>
> Although I think the configuration is a kind of broken, it can be seen
> as it is mimicing the case of shared-archive, where primary and
> standby share the same archive directory.
To be precise, the environment of this reproduction script is
different from our actual environment. I tried to make it as
simple as possible to reproduce the problem.
(In order to make it look like the actual environment, you have
to build a PG-REX environment.)
A simple replication environment might be enough, so I'll try to
recreate a script that is closer to the actual environment later.
> Basically we need to use an archive command like the following for
> that case to avoid this kind of failure. The script returns "success"
> when the target file is found but identical with the source file. I
> don't find such a description in the documentation, and haven't
> bothered digging into the mailing-list archive.
>
> ==
> #! /bin/bash
>
> if [ -f $2 ]; then
> cmp -s $1 $2
> if [ $? != 0 ]; then
> exit 1
> fi
> exit 0
> fi
>
> cp $1 $2
> ==
Thanks for your reply.
Since the above behavior is different from the behavior of the
test command in the following example in postgresql.conf, I think
we should write a note about this example.
# e.g. 'test ! -f /mnt/server/archivedir/%f && cp %p /mnt/server/archivedir/%f'
Let me describe the problem we faced.
- When archive_mode=always, archive_command is (sometimes) executed
in a situation where the history file already exists on the standby
side.
- In this case, if "test ! -f" is written in the archive_command of
postgresql.conf on the standby side, the command will keep failing.
Note that this problem does not occur when archive_mode=on.
So, what should we do for the user? I think we should put some notes
in postgresql.conf or in the documentation. For example, something
like this:
====
Note: If you use archive_mode=always, the archive_command on the standby side should not be used "test ! -f".
====
Regards,
Tatsuro Yamada
