Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 18:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> There seems like a number of ways that unresolved prepared transactions
>>> can cause problems. We really need to have startup mention how many
>>> prepared transactions there are, so we have some chance of understanding
>>> and resolving potential problems.
>> While I have no particular objection to such a log entry, I doubt it
>> will fix anything; how many people will really think to look in the
>> postmaster log?
>
> Even if it were just you and me. From my perspective, thats enough.
At least, such a message seems much more useful than the list of
historic startup messages that were removed recently. Just my two €-cents.
Best Regards
Michael Paesold
