Re: 2PC-induced lockup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: 2PC-induced lockup
Date
Msg-id 1184228349.4316.77.camel@ebony.site
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 2PC-induced lockup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 2PC-induced lockup  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Re: 2PC-induced lockup  (Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 18:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> > There seems like a number of ways that unresolved prepared transactions
> > can cause problems. We really need to have startup mention how many
> > prepared transactions there are, so we have some chance of understanding
> > and resolving potential problems.
> 
> While I have no particular objection to such a log entry, I doubt it
> will fix anything; how many people will really think to look in the
> postmaster log? 

Even if it were just you and me. From my perspective, thats enough.

--  Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB  http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error