Michael Paesold wrote:
> It's not about a certain standard. There are so many different ways in
> the world to write time units, so in a certain context a standard is
> really useful to constrain the format/syntax, but...
>
> This all was about usability of a configuration file, wasn't it? Now,
> Peter, you improved that very much with this change. But do you at the
> same time want to cripple the usefulness again by insisting on a certain
> _syntax_, while the _semantics_ are completely clear to (guessing) 99%
> of the people who will changes these settings?
FWIW, I agree entirely.
Regards, Dave
