On 06/13/07 17:23, PFC wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:09:20 +0200, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 06/13/07 16:59, PFC wrote:
>>>> Isn't it *supposed* to mis UNcommitted changes from other transactions?
>>> Well, if the "uncommited change" is a DELETE of the row that
>>> allowed the constraint check to pass, then when this delete is
>>> commited, your data is no longer consistent.
>>
>> The DELETE should block, no?
>
> Why ?
>
> Foreign keys put an ON DELETE trigger on the referenced table
Foreign keys that silently, automatic DELETE records?
Did I read that correctly?
> besides checking the referencing column on insert/update... If you just
> implement a constraint, you only get half the functionality.
But when I define a FK *constraint*, that's all I *want*!
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
