Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>
>>> I agree. XML seems like a fairly natural fit for this. Just as people should
>>> not try to shoehorn everything into XML, neither should they try to shoehorn
>>> everything into a relational format either.
>>>
>>> Now all we need is an XML schema for it ;-)
>> Well I am not a big fan of XML but it certainly seems applicable in this
>> case.
>
> I'm not a fan either so perhaps I'm biased, but this seems like a good example
> of where it would be an *awful* idea.
>
> Once you have an XML plan what can you do with it? All you can do is parse it
> into constituent bits and display it. You cant do any sort of comparison
> between plans, aggregate results, search for plans matching constraints, etc.
Honestly, I had never even considered doing such a thing. I would just
like a nice way to parse explain output :)
Joshua D. Drake
>
> How would I, with XML output, do something like:
>
> SELECT distinct node.relation
> FROM plan_table
> WHERE node.expected_rows < node.actual_rows*2;
>
> or
>
> SELECT node.type, average(node.ms/node.cost)
> FROM plan_table
> GROUP BY node.type;
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
