Tom Lane wrote:
> I agree with the idea of having an option to get EXPLAIN's output in
> an entirely different, more machine-readable format. Not wedded to
> XML, but I fear that a pure relational structure might be too strict ---
> there's a lot of variability in the entries already. XML also could
> deal naturally with nesting, whereas we'd have to jump through hoops
> to represent the plan tree structure in relational form.
>
>
I agree. XML seems like a fairly natural fit for this. Just as people
should not try to shoehorn everything into XML, neither should they try
to shoehorn everything into a relational format either.
Now all we need is an XML schema for it ;-)
cheers
andrew
