Re: multimaster - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Guy Rouillier
Subject Re: multimaster
Date
Msg-id 46609C89.2080804@burntmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: multimaster (was: Slightly OT.)  ("Alexander Staubo" <alex@purefiction.net>)
Responses Re: multimaster  ("Alexander Staubo" <alex@purefiction.net>)
Re: multimaster  (PFC <lists@peufeu.com>)
List pgsql-general
Alexander Staubo wrote:

> As it stands today, horizontally partitioning a database into multiple
> separate "shards" is incredibly invasive on the application
> architecture, and typically relies on brittle and non-obvious hacks
> such as configuring sequence generators with staggered starting
> numbers, omitting referential integrity constraints, sacrificing
> transactional semantics, and moving query aggregation into the app
> level. On top of this, dumb caches such as Memcached are typically
> layered to avoid hitting the database in the first place.

Have you looked at raidb?  http://c-jdbc.objectweb.org.  Narrow niche,
but if it happens to be the one you are in, then it's an option.  I took
a quick look at the user's page, and both of them were using PostgreSQL.

--
Guy Rouillier

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Alexander Staubo"
Date:
Subject: Re: Slightly OT.
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Slightly OT.